Monday 30 May 2011

Paul Verhoeven Film Restrospective offshoot - Basic Instinct 2

What has surprised me about Paul Verhoeven's career is that all of his Hollywood films have sported sequels or remakes. Robocop had the abysmal parts 2 and 3 as well as a spin-off TV series and cartoon. Total Recall spawned a short lived TV series and a remake is currently in the works. Hollow Man and Starship Troopers both had Direct-To-DVD sequels. Even Showgirls has a sequel that no-one has seen. Of all these sequels, Basic Instinct 2 is the most famous, and as it turned out, one of the lowest earning sequels of all time.

Why Basic Instinct 2 flopped is difficult to say, as it's not that bad a film. Don't get me wrong, it's not a great film, but there are some serious flaws that outweigh any of the good stuff, and there is a lot of good stuff there.

The sequel was, at one time, due to be directed by David Cronenberg. When asked why he would do a sequel to Basic Instinct, he responded that the film had an amazingly good script. He wasn't wrong. The script is really good, with a great twist, and had that script not been turned into a sequel to Basic Instinct, but was instead allowed to become a film in it's own right, it could have been a great film.

The direction isn't that bad either. It's director, Michael Canton Jones, has directed some great film such as Scandal, Doc Hollywood and the under-rated This Boys Life, with a young Leonardo DiCaprio more than holding his own against Robert De Niro. His direction of this film oozes seriousness and quality, and you get the feeling that he is trying to make a really good film out of this really good script.

Unfortunately, the reasons this film fails is because it's a sequel to Basic Instinct. As I said, if it had been a stand alone film, it could have been really good, but it constantly reminds you of the first one in the way it name-checks the characters of that film, and re-uses it's famous Jerry Goldsmith score. All these name checks do is remind you how much fun the first film is, but in his attempt at making the sequel something good and classy, much of that fun is missing resulting in a film that is surprisingly dull.

Also, by having it as a sequel, you are forced to buy a 50 year old Sharon Stone as a sex goddess that a famous psychiatrist would risk ruining his career over. Although she looks surprisingly good for her age (again, down to surgical enhancements), her sex scenes come across as a bit embarrassing, in the same way that Madonna is when she tries to act like a 30 year old in her videos. Instead of having someone create another great character, Sharon Stone seems to be doing a bad impersonation of Catherine Trammell, still trying to shock like she did in her youth.

Those moments of this film where they try to shock come across as forced, which is again down to them trying to re-create the shocks of it's predecessor. Had they made the film sooner, then maybe it would not have turned out too badly. Stone famously got a Play Or Pay deal for this film, meaning she still would have got paid even if they didn't make it, and when they almost didn't make it, she took the film studio to court for breach of contract. Had they have just given her the money, things may have turned out better for everyone.

IMDB currently gives Basic Instinct 2 a shockingly low 3.9, but I'd has to give it a slightly more generous 4.5. There's some good stuff in there and a great script screaming to get out, but by making it a sequel to a hugely successful erotic thriller from 20 years earlier, it has turned into a huge failure.

Paul Verhoeven Film Restrospective - Basic Instinct

After the huge double whammy of both Robocop and Total Recall, Paul Verhoeven was free to do whatever he wanted, and after 2 films with almost no nudity, he chose to reinvent the erotic thriller by directing Basic Instinct, creating what was at the time the most sexually explicit Hollywood film ever made.

In Basic Instinct, Michael Douglas (Wall Street, Romancing The Stone) plays a cop who is drawn into the world of author Catherine Tramell (Sharon Stone - Total Recall, Sliver) who may or may not have murdered a boyfriend in a manor that mirrored a scene from one of her books.

It's hard to believe that this in Verhoeven's only attempt at an erotic thriller, so synonymous is he with the genre. Of his Hollywood movies, only this and Showgirls weren't Sci-Fi movies, and Showgirls isn't as much a thriller as it is an erotic drama. Although his early Dutch movies have plenty of eroticism and nudity in them, they too are mostly dramas. The nearest he came to the erotic thriller was The 4th Man, yet despite being both erotic and a thriller, I still wouldn't describe as it as such as the sex scenes are quite minimal and there are supernatural elements to it. Verhoeven himself, however, does consider it as a sister piece to Basic Instinct.

Before watching Basic Instinct again for the first time in years, I was fully expecting to refer to how much the film has aged, yet was surprised to find that wasn't the case at all. Sure, some of the fashions are decidedly 90's but that is the period that the film is set in. I was also expecting to give the film average marks as my memory seemed to remember it as being quite corny, but while watching it again, I was surprised by just how good the film was. The direction is taut and ground breaking, with plenty of inspired moments. It's just that there is something about the film that stops you remembering how good it is. You forget about the intelligence that seeps into the film through the inspired direction because any flaws in the film are down to the story by Joe Eszterhas

Having written such successful films as Flashdance and Jagged Edge, Eszterhas was hot property in Hollywood, and it was that heat which allowed him to charge a cool $3 Million for the Basic Instinct script, at the time making it the most expensive film script in Hollywood history. Despite this films success, he quickly followed it with the likes of forgettable misfires, Sliver and Jade, both of which helped his career stall. His other big post-Instinct film was another team up with Verhoeven, but unfortunately, that turned out to be Showgirls.

As both Jade and Sliver proved, it takes some clever directing skills to turn a Joe Eszterhas script into an intelligent and exciting movie going experience, so it was fortunate that Basic Instinct had Verhoeven behind the camera. In a lesser director's hands, the twists and turns of the plot could have come across as contrived and ridiculous, and the sex scenes could have come across as embarrassing, but Verhoeven always keeps you guessing and second guessing whether or not Sharon Stone is a cold blooded killer.

When directing this film, Verhoeven stated that he was heavily influenced by Hitchcock's Vertigo, and you can see that influence, not just in the San Francisco setting, but throughout the film in the camera angles and cinematography. There is a great car chase scene in the film that invokes vertigo and fear in the viewer, as Michael Douglas follows Sharon Stone, attempting to overtake on blind corners while driving along high cliffs and hills, leaving you feeling more than a little giddy.

Basic Instinct does have a lot of sex in it, and it's because of this sex that the film has become so infamous. The most famous moment from this film, if not Verhoeven's career, is the interrogation scene, with the now legendary upskirt shot of Sharon Stone. This scene has been parodied throughout cinema in countless spoof comedies and TV shows. Other sex scenes in the film are surprisingly long and extremely explicit for their time, yet despite looking stunning in Total Recall, Sharon Stone is considerably less sexy in this film and I'm not sure why. One of the reasons may be down to the surgical enhancements she had between the two films. Jeanne Tripplehorn (Mickey Blue Eyes, Waterworld), on the other hand, is stunning in this film, both with her looks and her performance. It's a shame that we don't see more of her.

Basic Instinct is a great film when you are watching it, but memory tricks you into thinking it is something lesser than it is. Maybe this is the reason IMDB currently gives it 6.9, but I'd give it a slightly higher 7.5